Monday, June 4, 2012

project 5 : moma

FORECLOSED: REHOUSING
THE AMERICAN DREAM:Field Trip #6 Reaction

 Some of you may look at my gallery and may think is this art? to me this is and what better way to visualize and analyze a piece of work that has meaning and is attempted to be used in the future. Also due to the fact that civil engineer is my major it revoked me to strive and accomplish these blueprints and diagrams in the future. 

This project is for Keizer, ORE. and is called Nature-city and the way this project works is that the whole city is run on hydro power. as you can see the center is a circular dome which supplies water throughout the city and underneath the water is converted into electricity. this excites me and makes me ponder. 

hence, i always see people stare at a piece and they you wonder what are they thinking its just a painting. but for me this is art and this make me stare for some time and think bout what could be better how this project could come to be and how interesting the people who constructed this thought while making it.

hence you maybe spend hundreds of thousands dollars on a house when maybe a few thousand of technology is invented in it. the dream is to make the technology invested more then the price of the house. for example, when you by an IPhone for five hundred dollars the technology invested in it is over thousands of dollars. same with your car, you may purchase a care for ens maybe hundred thousands dollar and the technology invested are far greater.

http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/keizer/workac_1.jpg

http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/keizer/workac_14.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/keizer/workac_26.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/keizer/workac_17.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/keizer/workac_16.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/keizer/workac_18.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/keizer/workac_25.jpg

http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/keizer/workac_5.jpg


 

http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/templeterrace/VisibleWeather_9.jpg

 http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/templeterrace/VisibleWeather_3.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/templeterrace/VisibleWeather_5.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/templeterrace/VisibleWeather_7.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/templeterrace/VisibleWeather_8.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/templeterrace/View-04.jpghttp://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2012/foreclosed/images/templeterrace/View-12.jpg

feild trip 3


Design in our lives
Low functionality is a design that is not compatible for humans and doesn’t benefit humans in general. My high functionality objects both help save lives and is human compatible. The help point is a push of a button and then u speak to the speaker and help is informed right away as well as, information is given right away. The four types of processor that is suppose to help an overpopulated planet and “XXXX_sofa” both are uncomfortable and do not help humans relax or consume food easily. I don’t quite know how to improve the four processors but I’ve suggested a few things for the sofa if possible.
All four processor I encountered at the museum of modern arts made any sense to me. Would you expect any one to wear these equipment’s? Would a little girl be able to even carry herself with the weight of this equipment? I may not be a specialist in this topic but I know when the word is over populated scientist will find far better equipment to process food or if not make abundant resources of food. Why not build an equipment or ingredient that grew abundant amount of resources so the world would never have to come down to carry these hideous non-ergonomics’ designs.
This equipment to save lives is a very useful. It may not be ingenious but it sure is productive. If every ship or boat had one of these Viking life- saving equipment, I guarantee at least one life would be saved if not more. This is useful equipment because the human life is priceless and to save just one is gratitude your whole life. The way the equipment faces towards moving water, so if a person was lost or abandoned the equipment would face them and would be save n it can be steered as well as, more then one person can fit. So I believe this equipment is of high functionality.
This electronic device that is planed to be in every station possible is a great idea. There are so many tourists coming in and out of New York City and every one of them needs information to get somewhere. There are delays of sick passenger and passengers that cause a fight. People wouldn’t be scared to go in the train at night. The violent crimes taken place in train station will be diminished in not lowered.
This interchangeable sofa is really not necessary. Why would anyone want to sit in such an uncomfortable sofa made of polyamide? There are holes in the sofa and just because u can carry it and interchange it in a different kind of seating’s doesn’t mean anyone would enjoy sitting here. That is the reason we have sofas, to sit and relax. What I’d do to improve this sofa is to use much safer material and interchange it like you do in the sense of play doh. But have a more durable and sustainable backbone to hold the sofa.
Hence, A design does not have to be highly functional to be useful; for example, the Viking life- saving equipment that isn’t so much factional but it helps save more then one life so it becomes useful. Isn’t that what ergonomically means? Compatible or human stability believe art and design are separate because art is to be seen and enjoy by the viewer, but a design is to be useful or thought to be used. The line is unfortunately when I saw the four processors they were neither designs nor art.










1. Still images by Jason Evans
“Design for an overpopulated planet foragers”
Fiberglass 
2009

2. Viking life- saving equipment A/S
“Sea shelter”
Nylon and rubber
2004

3. MTA New York City transit team
‘Help point intercom for the New York City subway”
Polycarbonate, LEDs, and stainless steal
2004

4. Yoga ushida
“XXXX_sofa”
Polyamide
2010

Thursday, May 17, 2012

sahidul's oven cooken chicken: food art 1105

Sahidul Oven cooked chicken:


Chicken is a simple a tasty dish; to be honest this is my first time cooking, so I decided to look through the fridge and came across a pack of chicken pieces. so i cook some wings and drumsticks. But after I’ve made such a tasty dish without too much hassle, i started to make this every time I’m hungry and too lazy to go outside. This dish is usually an appetizer.

Ingredients:

Pack of craw chicken (12 – 14 pieces)
Big bowl
Spoon full of Chinese red hot spice
Black pepper grinder (half a cup)
Salt (2 spoonful)
Heavy-duty aluminum foil
Large oven pan
Oven
Olive oil (1 cup)
Tongs
Water
Soap
Mittens
Plate
Ketchup

Procedure:

Step 1 is to let the raw chicken soak in hot water
Step 2 is to separate the pieces of chicken wen soft
Step 3 is to place them in big bowl
Step 4 is to pour 1 cup of olive oil
Step 5 is to spread 2-table spoon of salt over the raw pieces of chicken
Step 6 is to put tablespoon of Chinese red hot spice
Step 6 is to mix all ingredients in the bowl with the pieces of chicken until evenly mixed.
Step 7 is to wash your hands with soap
Step 8 is to apply a sheet of heavy-duty aluminum foil onto the oven tray
Step 9 is to set the oven temperature to 375 degrees
Step 10 is to place pieces of chicken evenly on the aluminum foil
Step 11 is to wash your hands with soap
Step 12 is to place the oven try full of chicken pieces into the oven
Step 13 is to set timer to 50 minutes
Step 14 is to wash the bowl and set up your plate with ketchup
Step 15 is to take the oven tray out of the oven
Step 16 is to use the tong and evenly place cooked pieces of chicken onto the plate.
Step 17 is to sit down and ENJOY!

Monday, April 30, 2012

good art bad art


What is good art? What is bad art? Well after viewing the video of other peoples perspective of good and bad art. I agree with every single one of them. Good art is something that evokes a feeling inside the viewer. The viewer views the art is good if he/she can relate to the art in any way.
Bad art on the other hand, is art the doesn't live up to the viewers imagination. It lacks uniqueness, and is way too simple. Bad art is an opinion and can never be proven; its up to the viewer how he/she responds to the art.